This is the link to my website. I still don’t have much on it.
Look at the shadow.
To see the movies, click the links. The first is 27 seconds, the second is 44 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/v/mouUUWpEec0
This video is a loooonnnggg one.
http://www.youtube.com/v/vKKCDqfE3kE
I for one do not believe that man has landed on the moon. There is much evidence that he has, but there are even more disclaimers.
- On several video clips, there is the flag waving, flapping, and in one quite funny scene, the American flag blows back into the face of the astronaut who is trying to plant it. But wait a minute. Blowing. Flapping. Waving. What causes these things? I know! Wind. Wait a sec. There is no atmosphere on the moon, which means there is no air, let alone wind. Ergo, there is no such thing as wind on the moon which also means, that that flag is not on the moon.
- Shadows. The law of light is that, when it hits something, it casts a shadow in the opposite direction that the light hits it. Shadows of multiple things are in the same direction, because the light hits them the same. Basically, they are parallel. In several photos, the shadows intersect or are going in different directions. That is possible only when you have more than one light source. NASA only had one, the Sun. Therefore, they were doing this on earth, with multiple light sources. Also, several astronauts in photos appeared to be standing in a spotlight. Of course, the Sun is very bright. He was facing the camera, and his space suit was in high relief. His shadow was also towards the camera. This also is not possible without multiple light sources. Last, but not least, with shadow. If you, yourself, step in one, you become ‘part’ of the shadow, and are much harder to see. In a few photos and clips, there are astronauts descending into the shadow of the space ship. The Sun is directly behind it. Yet you can still see the astronaut clearly, and his space suit is reflecting light from nowhere. Again, there was supposedly, as NASA claims. No other light source. This, again, would not be possible.
- Craters. On a scientific depiction for what NASA thought would be the space landing, there was a great explosion, and a humongous crater. But on all six moon landings, there were no craters visible. The force of landing should have caused a crater. Not so, says a NASA LEM specialist, Paul Fjeld. "The amount of thrust that you need coming out of the bottom of the engine is about 1500, 2,000 pounds of thrust. And all that does is just push dust away. There’s no burning or anything like that."1st*
Unfortunately for NASA, this just proves another of Bill Kaysing’s points. If all the dust has been pushed away, how can there be thick dust littered with footprints, right near where the space ship landed, and that it be directly after. Of course, the dust would have eventually settled. Why then, don’t the landing pads have any dust on them?
In conclusion, I would just like to remind you that NASA had a 40 billion dollar budget. Don’t you think that if NASA wanted to fool you, they couldn’t have done it more eloquently? Movies do that, and you never see the mistakes.
Also remember this. The human brain is one of the easiest to deceive.
I have given you this information in hopes that I can persuade you to my side, but your opinions are your own and I can’t change them. There are other points on the documentary
All of the information I have here is from the 44- minute long documentary I have on my post. That, and common sense.
1st* This was a direct quote from Paul Fjeld.
* Leave me a comment on what side you are on, and if you are the opposite, please, feel free to try and cut your opposition down (a.k.a. me) I look forward to hearing your views.
Sonja
The website that the picture was on is http://www.athousandandone.com
The 2 movies are from http://www.youtube.com
<
